← Back to blog

Australian SMSF bare trust: 8 steps to fix state timing, avoid duty

September 9, 2026
Australian SMSF bare trust: 8 steps to fix state timing, avoid duty

If your SMSF is borrowing to buy an acquirable asset, you must use a bare trust for the arrangement; there are no exceptions. From 10 August 2026, new limits under ATO guidance mean new residential LRBAs are severely restricted, while commercial and business real property borrowing continues largely unaffected. Existing residential arrangements settled before that date generally keep their grandfathered status.


TL;DR:

  • A bare trust is mandatory for SMSF borrowing to acquire assets under an LRBA, with the trust holding only one specific asset for the duration of the loan.
  • The deed must be drafted and executed in the correct order before signing any property contract, considering each state's timing rules to avoid double duty.
  • Most lenders require a corporate custodian for the bare trust, which simplifies title registration and reduces the risk of settlement delays or compliance issues.
  • Starting the process early by establishing the custodian, drafting the deed, and confirming timing rules can prevent costly mistakes like duty double charges or lender rejection.
  • Once the LRBA is repaid, title transfer should be done thoughtfully, balancing registry fees and structure simplicity, with legal and duty considerations varying by state.

Zenrgfinance
Navigate SMSF Lending With Confidence
ZENRG Finance helps SMSF borrowers make informed decisions through complex financing processes with tailored, holistic support.
Explore SMSF lending support

Table of Contents

What is an SMSF bare trust and when does your fund need one?

A bare trust is a legal structure where one party (the trustee, often called a custodian) holds legal title to an asset purely on behalf of another party, the beneficial owner, with zero discretion over what happens to it. In the SMSF context, that beneficial owner is your fund. The custodian's job is to sit still, hold the title, and do exactly what the SMSF trustee instructs.

This matters because of how limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs) work. Under section 67A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993, an SMSF can borrow to acquire a single asset, but only if that asset is held by a separate bare trustee for the life of the loan. If the fund defaults, the lender's recourse is limited to that one asset, not the rest of the fund's investments. That ring-fencing is the entire point of the structure.

A few situations to keep straight:

  • You need a bare trust whenever your SMSF borrows money to acquire property, shares, or another asset under an LRBA.
  • You don't need one if your fund is buying the asset outright with existing super balance, no borrowing involved.
  • The trust must hold exactly one asset (or a collection of identical assets treated as one, such as a parcel of shares in a single company), never a multi-asset portfolio under one deed.

Skip the bare trust on a borrowed purchase and the ATO will treat it as a breach of the borrowing restrictions, which can trigger the fund losing its complying status entirely.

Section 67A of the SISA is the statutory permission slip. It sets out the conditions an LRBA must meet: a single acquirable asset, a separate holding trust, and limited recourse for the lender. Everything else, the deed wording, the lending conditions, the state duty treatment, gets built around that framework.

The ATO's LRBA guidance is what auditors and lenders actually check against in practice. It confirms compliance requirements and details the 2026 changes affecting residential property borrowing.

The 10 August 2026 shift matters more than most trustees realise. New residential LRBAs face tight new limits from that date, which is already pushing SMSF gearing activity toward business real property, refinancing existing arrangements, and grandfathered residential deals that settled beforehand. If your fund has an exchange date sitting close to that line, confirming which side of it you land on should be your first call, not an afterthought.

State revenue offices add another layer entirely. Duty treatment of a bare trust deed varies by jurisdiction, and Revenue NSW's guidance on declarations of trust shows how much timing affects the duty outcome in New South Wales specifically. Get the signing order wrong and you can trigger duty twice on the same transaction, once on the declaration of trust and again on the eventual transfer.

Key regulatory touchpoints trustees should keep on file:

  • Section 67A SISA for the statutory borrowing conditions.
  • ATO LRBA guidance for compliance checks and the 2026 residential changes.
  • Your relevant state revenue office (Revenue NSW, State Revenue Office Victoria, or your local equivalent) for duty and stamping rules.
  • The relevant land registry (Land Victoria and its interstate counterparts) for title registration requirements.

Who should act as bare trustee: corporate custodian or individual?

The bare trustee's legal job is to have no independent discretion whatsoever, sometimes called the "puppet trustee" principle. The deed must strip out any power for the custodian to sell, refinance, or otherwise deal with the asset on its own initiative. Draft the deed with even a whiff of independent authority and you risk the ATO treating the arrangement as failing the single acquirable asset test, or a lender refusing to settle.

Most SMSF specialists and lenders now expect a stand-alone corporate custodian rather than an individual acting as trustee, and industry lending practice increasingly treats this as close to mandatory. The reasons are practical:

  • A company can't die, resign unexpectedly, or lose capacity the way an individual trustee can.
  • Liability sits with the corporate entity, keeping personal assets of the humans behind it separated from the trust's obligations.
  • Most lenders prefer or require corporate trustees on both sides of the arrangement, the SMSF trustee and the bare trustee, because it simplifies title registration and reduces audit complications later.

Setting one up means registering a company with ASIC, obtaining its own ABN, and confirming whether it needs a separate TFN depending on how your accountant structures the arrangement.

Pro Tip: Set up the corporate custodian well before you find a property. Racing to incorporate a company after signing a contract is one of the most common causes of settlement delays in SMSF property purchases.

Setting up a compliant bare trust: the order that keeps you out of trouble

Getting the sequence right matters more than almost anything else in this process. State revenue rules genuinely differ on when a deed can be dated relative to the contract, and practitioner guides consistently flag this as the single most common paperwork error in SMSF lending.

A workable order looks like this:

  1. Establish the SMSF and confirm its trust deed and investment strategy permit borrowing.
  2. Incorporate the corporate custodian company with ASIC and obtain its ABN.
  3. Draft the bare trust deed before signing any property contract, with your solicitor confirming state-specific timing rules.
  4. Identify the property and check finance pre-approval with your chosen lender.
  5. Sign the contract of sale in the correct entity name, the bare trustee, not the SMSF trustee directly.
  6. Execute the bare trust deed in line with your state's timing requirements to avoid duty being triggered twice.
  7. Finalise the loan documents and mortgage with the lender, secured against the single asset.
  8. Settle the purchase, with the custodian taking legal title and the SMSF holding beneficial ownership.

State timing genuinely varies. In New South Wales, Revenue NSW's duty rulings treat an incorrectly timed declaration of trust as a dutiable event in its own right. Other states apply different tests around when beneficial ownership is deemed to pass. Never assume your interstate colleague's timeline applies to your property, always verify current rules with a solicitor licensed in that state.

Before lenders will approve settlement, expect them to request:

  • The executed bare trust deed and SMSF trust deed.
  • Evidence of the corporate custodian's ASIC registration.
  • The signed contract of sale in the bare trustee's name.
  • Confirmation the SMSF's investment strategy accommodates the borrowing.

What lenders expect and what it actually costs

Lenders assessing an SMSF LRBA application aren't just checking your borrowing capacity, they're checking the entire structure holds together. Most now expect a corporate trustee for the SMSF itself, a corporate custodian for the bare trust, and deed wording that explicitly supports mortgage execution, sometimes called a bank-ready clause. Common deed templates build this wording in from the start rather than leaving it for later amendment.

Budget for these typical cost items:

  • Corporate custodian company formation through ASIC, generally a few hundred dollars in registration fees.
  • Bare trust deed drafting, which varies depending on whether you use a template or commission bespoke legal drafting.
  • State stamping or duty fees on the declaration of trust, where applicable in your state.
  • Land registry fees for title registration at settlement.
  • Ongoing company maintenance, including ASIC's annual review fee for the custodian.

Get every document checked before submission to your lender rather than after. A pre-submission review by your solicitor or broker, checking entity names match across the contract, deed, and loan documents, catches the errors that otherwise surface at settlement and cost you the exchange date.

The mistakes that cost trustees money and time

Granting the custodian any independent discretion is the single biggest drafting error in bare trust deeds. Legal and lending specialists consistently flag this as the technical risk that undoes otherwise sound arrangements, because deed wording that gives the custodian any independent powers breaks the puppet trustee principle the whole structure depends on.

Other traps show up again and again in practice:

  • Naming the wrong party on the contract of sale. If the SMSF trustee signs instead of the bare trustee (or vice versa), fixing it after exchange can trigger duty twice, once on the original contract and again on any subsequent transfer.
  • Getting the signing sequence backwards for your state. Practitioner warnings note that incorrect timing between contract exchange and deed execution is a leading cause of double stamp duty and lender rejection.
  • Trying to fund multiple properties under one bare trust deed. The single acquirable asset rule means each property needs its own trust structure, no exceptions for convenience.
  • Using borrowed LRBA funds for renovations that go beyond repairs and maintenance. Structural improvements funded through loan proceeds can breach the single acquirable asset test if they change the asset's fundamental character.

Mitigate all of this with a simple discipline: get sign off from both a solicitor experienced in SMSF trusts and your accountant before contracts are exchanged, not after. Keep audit-ready trustee minutes documenting every decision, and run your paperwork past your lender's SMSF team before you're locked into a settlement date.

Pro Tip: Ask your solicitor to confirm, in writing, the exact date the bare trust deed should be signed relative to your contract exchange for your specific state. This single email has saved SMSF trustees thousands in avoidable duty.

How Zenrgfinance supports trustees through the bare trust process

Coordinating an SMSF bare trust means keeping the lender, the solicitor drafting the deed, and the accountant managing compliance all moving in step. A mortgage brokerage can coordinate communication between the lender, solicitor, and accountant to align lender conditions with the bare trust deed early so nothing needs reworking at settlement.

Our approach starts with a structured questionnaire that scopes your SMSF lending needs before any documents are drafted, flagging potential timing or entity issues while they're still cheap to fix. Legal advice on deed wording and state duty always sits with your solicitor, and tax structuring with your accountant, but Such a service can help you know exactly when to bring each in.

What the research gets right, and where trustees still get caught out

The legal framework around SMSF bare trusts is clearer than most trustees assume. Section 67A sets a straightforward test, the ATO publishes its expectations openly, and state revenue offices have published duty rulings for years. The gap isn't in the law, it's in execution timing.

Conventional advice tends to treat bare trust setup as a legal formality, something your solicitor handles while you focus on the property itself. That's backwards. The single most expensive mistakes, double stamp duty, lender rejection, ATO non-recognition of an LRBA, all trace back to sequencing errors that happen before a solicitor even gets fully involved: which entity signs the contract, and when the deed gets dated relative to exchange.

If you take one thing from this, prioritise the sequence before you prioritise the property. Confirm your corporate custodian exists, your deed is drafted, and your state's timing rules are understood, before you sign anything. The 10 August 2026 residential LRBA changes make this even more urgent for trustees eyeing residential property, since the margin for error on exchange dates has effectively disappeared.

— Allen

Transferring title once the LRBA loan is repaid

Once your SMSF has repaid the LRBA loan in full, legal title can transfer from the custodian to the SMSF trustee directly, or you can choose to leave it with the custodian. Most trustees transfer title to simplify the fund's structure once the borrowing risk that justified the bare trust no longer exists.

The relevant land registry, Land Victoria in Victoria or its interstate equivalents, will typically require evidence of the original bare trust deed, confirmation the loan is discharged, and a transfer document before updating the register.

On duty, most states offer an exemption on this transfer since beneficial ownership never actually changed, only legal title moved. You still need to actively claim that exemption with your state revenue office rather than assuming it applies automatically.

Weighing up whether to transfer:

  • Leaving title with the custodian avoids transfer paperwork and fees but keeps an extra corporate entity in your structure indefinitely.
  • Transferring to the SMSF trustee simplifies future dealings with the asset but involves registry fees and requires confirming your state's duty exemption paperwork.

If your fund plans further borrowing down the track, some trustees keep the custodian structure intact rather than winding it up, since re-establishing it later duplicates cost.

Ready to move forward on an SMSF property purchase or refinance? Speak with a mortgage team about structuring your bare trust and LRBA correctly from the first document.

Sources